{"id":25581,"date":"2013-08-29T13:52:26","date_gmt":"2013-08-29T11:52:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/?p=25581"},"modified":"2013-08-29T13:52:26","modified_gmt":"2013-08-29T11:52:26","slug":"%c2%bfpor-que-china-rusia-e-iran-se-oponen-a-la-intervencion-en-siria-why-are-china-russia-and-iran-oppose-intervention-in-syria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/?p=25581","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 China, Rusia e Ir\u00e1n se oponen a la intervenci\u00f3n en Siria?.Why are China, Russia and Iran oppose intervention in Syria?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tweet<\/a><\/p>

…………………<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 China, Rusia e Ir\u00e1n se oponen a la intervenci\u00f3n en Siria?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Why are China, Russia and Iran oppose intervention in Syria?<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

BBc \u00a0\u00a0Mundo<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Etnopaisaje.com + dibujos<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

..\"image002\"<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

.
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

En las \u00faltimas horas cambi\u00f3 s\u00fabitamente la situaci\u00f3n en un conflicto que ha durado m\u00e1s de dos a\u00f1os: Washington y sus aliados dicen estar listos para tomar alg\u00fan tipo de acci\u00f3n militar contra Siria.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

En Estados Unidos los medios informan que el presidente Obama presentar\u00e1, quiz\u00e1s el jueves, lo que se dice es \u00abevidencia innegable\u00bb de que realmente ocurri\u00f3 un ataque con armas qu\u00edmicas en Siria y de que el m\u00e1s probable responsable fue el presidente de esa naci\u00f3n, Bashar al Asad. Sobre esta base se espera que Obama tome una decisi\u00f3n para intervenir militarmente en ese pa\u00eds.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

En Reino Unido el primer ministro David Cameron present\u00f3 una propuesta de resoluci\u00f3n al Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU \u00aben la que se autorizan las medidas necesarias para proteger a los civiles\u00bb en Siria.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Francia y Turqu\u00eda tambi\u00e9n se han unido a las intenciones de llevar a cabo una medida de fuerza militar contra Siria.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Todo indica que las advertencias de no intervenci\u00f3n que han hecho los aliados de Siria, Rusia e Ir\u00e1n, adem\u00e1s de China, han ca\u00eddo en o\u00eddos sordos.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

En BBC Mundo le explicamos porqu\u00e9 estos tres pa\u00edses se oponen a una intervenci\u00f3n<\/span><\/strong> armada y cu\u00e1les son los intereses que est\u00e1n en juego en la regi\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Desde 2012 Ir\u00e1n increment\u00f3 dr\u00e1sticamente su apoyo militar a las fuerzas del presidente sirio Bashar<\/span><\/strong> al Asad. Con este sustento de Ir\u00e1n, adem\u00e1s de ofrecer la necesitada ayuda que requer\u00eda Asad, el conflicto entr\u00f3 en una nueva fase de guerra sectaria: las armas de Ir\u00e1n llegaron al grupo militante chiita Hezbol\u00e1 -basado en L\u00edbano- y \u00e9ste se volvi\u00f3 cada vez m\u00e1s activo dentro de Siria ayudando a las fuerzas de Asad.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

El martes, despu\u00e9s de que Washington dijo estar \u00ablisto\u00bb para intervenir en Siria, el gobierno de Ir\u00e1n respondi\u00f3 de inmediato.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

El portavoz de la canciller\u00eda iran\u00ed, Abbas Araqchi, dijo que Teher\u00e1n est\u00e1 tan resuelto a defender a Asad como Washington est\u00e1 resuelto a atacarlo.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abQueremos hacer una firme advertencia contra cualquier ataque militar contra Siria\u00bb dijo el funcionario en una conferencia de prensa.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abDefinitivamente habr\u00e1 consecuencias peligrosas para la regi\u00f3n.<\/strong> Y estas consecuencias y sus complicaciones no quedar\u00e1n restringidas a Siria. Involucrar\u00e1n a toda la regi\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Ir\u00e1n, que es principalmente chiita, es el aliado m\u00e1s cercano de Siria y repetidamente ha acusado a los islamistas sunitas, Israel y Occidente de tratar de usar el conflicto para dominar la regi\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Pero el acercamiento de Ir\u00e1n y Siria no es s\u00f3lo ideol\u00f3gico. Tambi\u00e9n hay fuertes lazos econ\u00f3micos<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Desde que Estados Unidos y Europa impusieron sus sanciones econ\u00f3micas contra Teher\u00e1n, la relaci\u00f3n econ\u00f3mica entre ambos se volvi\u00f3 cada vez m\u00e1s importante.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abGasoducto estrat\u00e9gico\u00bb<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

El mes pasado, se inform\u00f3 que Ir\u00e1n, Irak y Siria firmaron un acuerdo para la construcci\u00f3n de lo que se dice ser\u00e1 el mayor gasoducto en el Medio Oriente capaz de transportar gas natural desde el sur de Ir\u00e1n hasta Europ<\/span><\/strong>a.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Seg\u00fan el diario <\/span><\/strong>Teher\u00e1n Times<\/span><\/em><\/strong>, el transporte de gas se llevar\u00e1 a cabo por un conducto de 6.000 kil\u00f3metros que atravesar\u00e1 Irak, Ir\u00e1n, Siria y L\u00edbano para luego ir a Europa bajo el Mar Mediterr\u00e1neo. <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Como era de esperarse, muchos no recibieron positivamente el anuncio.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abUn gasoducto desde Ir\u00e1n ser\u00eda muy rentable para Siria. Europa tambi\u00e9n podr\u00eda obtener beneficios con \u00e9ste. Pero es claro que muchos no est\u00e1n contentos con el trato\u00bb, dice Dmitry Minin, analista del Centro Global Research, basado en Canad\u00e1.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abLos aliados de Occidente que abastecen de gas y petr\u00f3leo a Europa desde el Golfo P\u00e9rsico, (v\u00eda Qatar y Arabia Saudita) no est\u00e1n contentos, y tampoco est\u00e1 contento el principal transportista de gas actualmente: Turqu\u00eda\u00bb.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Nafeez Ahmed, director del Instituto para Investigaci\u00f3n de Pol\u00edtica y Desarrollo en el Reino Unido escribe en el per\u00edodico <\/span>The Guardian,<\/span><\/em> que dicho gasoducto \u00abpotencialmente consolidar\u00eda la posici\u00f3n de Ir\u00e1n como un poderoso actor global\u00bb. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abEl gasoducto es una \u00abbofetada directa\u00bb para Qatar<\/strong>, que planea construir su propio gasoducto a trav\u00e9s de Arabia Saudita, Jordania, Siria y Turqu\u00eda, tambi\u00e9n para abastecer a los mercados europeos (con el apoyo de Estados Unidos)\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abEstados Unidos, Israel y otras potencias han sido jugadores muy poco honestos\u00bb afirma Ahmed. \u00abDetr\u00e1s de la fachada de preocupaci\u00f3n humanitaria, hay intereses familiares en juego\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Pero Ir\u00e1n, se\u00f1alan los comentaristas, parece estar resuelto a defender su importante proyecto.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Desde que comenz\u00f3 el conflicto en Siria, tanto China como Rusia han utilizado sus poderes de veto en el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU para bloquear cualquier acci\u00f3n que conduzca a sanciones contra el r\u00e9gimen de Al Asad.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Y ahora, tras el supuesto ataque con armas qu\u00edmicas que bajo la ley internacional ser\u00eda ilegal, Mosc\u00fa y Pek\u00edn contin\u00faan firmes en sus posiciones.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,,,,,,,,,,,,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Los medios chinos, que son la principal voz del r\u00e9gimen en Pek\u00edn, advierten este mi\u00e9rcoles sobre una intervenci\u00f3n de Occidente y llaman a esperar el informe de la ONU sobre el supuesto ataque.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abNo debe haber afirmaciones impulsivas hasta que la verdad haya sido verificada y mucho menos debe haber un ‘presunto culpable’ o utilizar esto como pretexto para tomar una acci\u00f3n militar unilateral\u00bb dice en un editorial la agencia oficial de noticias Xinhua.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Otros medios tambi\u00e9n advierten sobre lo que dicen podr\u00eda ser una repetici\u00f3n de la invasi\u00f3n que Estados Unidos dirigi\u00f3 contra Irak en 2003 sin un mandato de la ONU.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abLa comunidad internacional necesita mostrarse vigilante contra las fuerzas externas que intentan replicar este modelo en Siria\u00bb dice <\/span>The People’s Daily,<\/span><\/em> el peri\u00f3dico del Partido Comunista. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abEl ‘uso de armas qu\u00edmicas’ no puede ser manejado con medidas ‘infundadas’ y cualquier acci\u00f3n de seguimiento necesita estar apoyada por hallazgos verdaderos y confiables de una investigaci\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Y el <\/span>Global Times,<\/span><\/em> un peri\u00f3dico afiliado tambi\u00e9n al Partido Comunista, afirma que \u00ablas fuerzas alrededor del mundo que se oponen a una intervenci\u00f3n militar externa deben unirse para prevenir, hasta donde sea posible, que Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y otros lancen ataques a\u00e9reos contra Siria. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abY si esto no se puede evitar, deben abiertamente apoyar al gobierno sirio para entablar una resistencia. Rusia e Ir\u00e1n necesitan considerar el ofrecimiento de asistencia militar directa, y China y otros pa\u00edses deben dar su apoyo\u00bb agrega.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abResentida\u00bb<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Hasta ahora China no ha sido objeto de cr\u00edticas de Occidente como lo ha sido Rusia por su posici\u00f3n \u00abintransigente\u00bb frente a Siria. Y muchos creen que China mantiene un bajo perfil en Medio Oriente y no tiene intereses en la regi\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Pero en los \u00faltimos a\u00f1os Pek\u00edn ha desarrollado considerables lazos en los sectores econ\u00f3mico, militar y energ\u00e9tico de la regi\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Tal como explica Amanda Paul, analista del Centro de Pol\u00edtica Europea, en el peri\u00f3dico turco <\/span>Today’s Zaman,<\/span><\/em> China desea expandir su participaci\u00f3n en el Medio Oriente. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abEn 2011 China fue el principal socio comercial de Siria, con exportaciones valuadas en m\u00e1s de US$2.400 millones. Esto, sin embargo, no es mucho dinero si se compara con el comercio de China en otros pa\u00edses y es un factor insignificante en su pol\u00edtica hacia Damasco\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,,,,,,,,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abM\u00e1s bien -dice la analista- a lo que China parece oponerse es a una mayor presencia de Estados Unidos en esta regi\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abHay temores de que una presencia militar de EE.UU. en Siria conduzca a un ataque contra Ir\u00e1n, lo cual otorgar\u00eda a Occidente mayor acceso a los recursos energ\u00e9ticos de la regi\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abY China ya resiente la creciente presencia militar de Washington en la regi\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

—-<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

—-<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Pek\u00edn tambi\u00e9n es muy sensible ante las sanciones y las intervenciones de Occidente, de las cuales fue objeto durante los siglos XIX y XX, dice Amanda Paul.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Rusia ha sido el m\u00e1s enf\u00e1tico defensor de Bashar al Asad y su principal proveedor de armas.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Hasta ahora Mosc\u00fa es quien ha hecho la advertencia m\u00e1s expl\u00edcita sobre una intervenci\u00f3n militar en Siria que, dijo, tendr\u00eda \u00abconsecuencias catastr\u00f3ficas\u00bb para toda la regi\u00f3n.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Esta semana, el viceprimer ministro ruso public\u00f3 un tuit diciendo que \u00abOccidente est\u00e1 jugando con el mundo isl\u00e1mico como un chimpanc\u00e9 con una granada\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Mosc\u00fa tambi\u00e9n contin\u00faa sosteniendo que no hay pruebas de que el presidente Al Asad fue responsable del supuesto ataque con armas qu\u00edmicas cerca de Damasco.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

E insiste que cualquier acci\u00f3n militar sin un mandato de la ONU ser\u00eda \u00abuna grave violaci\u00f3n de la ley internacional\u00bb. Pero si Occidente decidiera finalmente intervenir, \u00bfc\u00f3mo responder\u00eda Mosc\u00fa?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Tal como se\u00f1ala Steven Rosenberg, corresponsal de la BBC en Mosc\u00fa, a pesar de los recientes comentarios \u00abenvalentonados\u00bb en los medios rusos y las advertencias sobre una intervenci\u00f3n, \u00abes poco probable que Rusia se vea involucrada directamente en una confrontaci\u00f3n militar con Occidente.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abEl canciller ruso Sergei Lavrov ya dej\u00f3 en claro que su pa\u00eds \u00abno tiene planes de entrar en guerra con nadie\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abPero hay otras formas con las que Rusia podr\u00eda mostrar su desaprobaci\u00f3n ante una intervenci\u00f3n de Occidente y su enojo con Estados Unidos\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Contratos valiosos<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Podr\u00eda, por ejemplo, incrementar su abastecimiento de armas a Damasco, establecer una relaci\u00f3n m\u00e1s estrecha con Ir\u00e1n o reducir su cooperaci\u00f3n con Washington, explica el corresponsal<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Lo que es claro es que Rusia no abandonar\u00e1 a su aliado m\u00e1s cercano en Medio Oriente ni sus intereses en Siria: incluida la base naval que mantiene en Tartus<\/strong>, en el Mediterr\u00e1neo, ni sus jugosos contratos comerciales con Damasco, principalmente por venta de armas.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abDespu\u00e9s de haber perdido un contrato de US$13.000 millones con Ir\u00e1n<\/strong>, debido a las sanciones internacionales, y de que le cancelaron contratos de US$4.500 millones con Libia, la industria de defensa rusa se tambalea\u00bb dice en un comentario en CNN.com el profesor Daniel Treisman del Departamento de Ciencia Pol\u00edtica de la Universidad de California en Los \u00c1ngeles<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abAdem\u00e1s de exportaciones de armas, las compa\u00f1\u00edas rusas han hecho enormes inversiones en la infraestructura siria<\/strong> y en los sectores de energ\u00eda y turismo, los cuales han sido valuados en $US19.400 millones\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

In the last few hours suddenly changed the situation in a conflict that has lasted more than two years: Washington and its allies say they are ready to take some kind of military action against Syria.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

In United States media report that President Obama will present, perhaps on Thursday, what is said is \u00abundeniable evidence\u00bb that actually occurred an attack with chemical weapons in Syria and that was most likely responsible for the President of that nation, Bashar Al-Assad. On this basis it is expected that Obama take a decision to intervene militarily <\/span>in<\/span> that country.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

In United Kingdom Prime Minister David Cameron presented a draft resolution to the Security Council of the United Nations \u00abin which measures to protect civilians are authorized\u00bb in Syria.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,,,,,,,,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

France and Turkey have also joined the intentions to carry out a measure of military force against Syria.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Everything indicates that the warnings of nonintervention made allies of Syria, Russia and Iran, as well as China, have fallen on deaf ears.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Click see: are chemical weapons in Syria? Analysis of evidence in videoEn BBC World will explain why these three countries oppose armed intervention and what are the interests that are at stake in the region.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span> <\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

From 2012 Iran drastically increased its military support to the forces of the Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. With the support of Iran, as well as providing needed support requiring Asad, the conflict entered a new phase of sectarian war: weapons of Iran came to the Shiite militant group Hezbollah – Lebanon – based and this became increasingly more active in Syria helping to Asad’s forces.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

On Tuesday, since Washington said he was \u00abready\u00bb to intervene in Syria, the Government of Iran replied immediately.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

The spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Abbas Araqchi, said that Tehran is so resolute to defend Assad as Washington is determined to attack it.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abWe want to make a firm warning against any attack against Syria military\u00bb he said at a press conference.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abDefinitely there will be dangerous consequences for the region. And these consequences and its complications will not be restricted to Syria. They involve the entire region\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Iran, which is mainly Shiite, is Syria’s closest ally and has repeatedly accused Islamist Sunnis, Israel and the West of trying to use the conflict to dominate the region.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/span>But the approach of Iran and Syria is not only ideological. There are also strong economic ties.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

From the United States and Europe imposed its economic sanctions against Tehran, the economic relationship between the two became increasingly important.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abStrategic pipeline\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Last month, it was reported that Iran, Iraq and Syria signed an agreement for the construction of what is said will be the largest pipeline in the Middle East capable of transporting natural gas from southern Iran to Europe.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

According to the Tehran Times, gas transportation will take place through a 6,000 kilometers that pass through Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon then go to Europe under the Mediterranean Sea.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

As it was expected, many did not receive positively the announcement.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abA gas pipeline from Iran would be very profitable for Syria. Europe could also benefit with this. But it is clear that many are not happy with the deal,\u00bbsays Dmitry Minin, the Global Research Center analyst, based in Canada.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThe allies of the West that supply gas and oil to Europe from the Persian Gulf (via Qatar and Saudi Arabia) are not happy and not happy the main carrier of gas currently: Turkey\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Nafeez Ahmed, director of the Institute for research policy and development in the United Kingdom writes in The Guardian newspaper, that the pipeline \u00abpotentially consolidate the position of Iran as a powerful global player\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThe pipeline is a\u00bbdirect blow\u00bbto Qatar, which plans to build his own pipeline through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, also to supply European markets (with the support of the United States).\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abUnited States, Israel and other powers have been very little honest players\u00bb says Ahmed. \u00abBehind the facade of humanitarian concern, there are family interests at stake.\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

But Iran, say commentators, seems to be determined to defend his major project.(none) An error above report<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Since the beginning of the conflict in Syria, both China and Russia have used their powers of veto in the UN Security Council to block any action that will lead to sanctions against the regime of Al-Assad.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

And now, after the so-called that attack with chemical weapons under international law would be illegal, Moscow and Beijing remain firm in their positions.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

The Chinese media, which are the main voice of the regime in Beijing, warned Wednesday about a Western intervention and called to wait for the report of the United Nations about the alleged attack.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abNot impulsive statements until the truth has been verified and much less must have a ‘ presumed guilty ‘ or use this as a pretext for unilateral military action\u00bb said in an editorial, the official Xinhua News Agency.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Other media also warn of what they say could be a repeat of the invasion of United States directed against Iraq in 2003 without a UN mandate.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThe international community needs to be vigilant against external forces that try to replicate this model in Syria,\u00bb said The People’s Daily, the newspaper of the Communist Party.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThe use of chemical weapons cannot be handled with ‘unfounded’ measures and any follow-up action needs to be supported by true and reliable findings of an investigation.\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

And the Global Times, a newspaper affiliated to the Communist Party, also says that \u00abthe forces around the world to oppose external military intervention should unite to prevent, to the extent possible, to the United States, United Kingdom and others launch airstrikes against Syria.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abAnd if this cannot be avoided, should openly support the Syrian Government to establish a resistance. Russia and Iran need to consider offering direct military assistance, and China and other countries must give their support,\u00bbhe added.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abResentful\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

So far, China has not been criticized in the West as it has Russia by its \u00abintransigent\u00bb position on Syria. And many believe that China maintains a low profile in the Middle East and has no interests in the region.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

But in recent years Beijing has developed significant ties in the sectors economic, military, and energy in the region.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

As explains Amanda Paul, analyst of the Centre of European politics, the Turkish newspaper Today’s Zaman, China wishes to expand its participation in the Middle East.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abIn 2011 China was the main trading partner of Syria, with exports valued at more than US$ 2.4 billion. This, however, is not much money compared to China’s trade in other countries and it is a negligible factor in its policy toward Damascus\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00ab- Says the analyst – what China seems to oppose is rather to an increased presence of United States in this region\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThere are fears that US military presence.UU. \u00abin Syria will lead to an attack on Iran, which would be granted to the West greater access to the energy resources of the region\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abAnd China already resents Washington’s growing military presence in the region.\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Beijing is also very sensitive to the sanctions and interventions of the West, which was subjected during the 19th and 20th centuries, said Amanda Paul.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Russia has been more emphatic defender of Bashar Al-Assad and its main arms supplier.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

So far Moscow is who has done the most explicit warning about intervention military in Syria which, it said, would have \u00abdisastrous consequences\u00bb for the region.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

This week, Russian Vice Premier published a Tweet saying that \u00abWest is playing with the Islamic world as a chimpanzee with a grenade\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Moscow also continues to hold that there is no evidence that President Al-Assad was responsible for the alleged attack with chemical weapons near Damascus.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

And he insists that any military action without a UN mandate would be \u00aba grave violation of international law\u00bb. But if West decides to finally intervene, would respond Moscow?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

As points out Steven Rosenberg, the BBC correspondent in Moscow, despite recent comments \u00abemboldened\u00bb in the Russian media and warnings about intervention, \u00abit is unlikely that Russia is directly involved in a military confrontation with the West.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abThe Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov already made it clear that his country\u00bbhas no plans to go to war with anyone\u00bb.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

……….<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abBut there are other ways that Russia could show their disapproval to a Western intervention and his anger with the United States.\u00bb<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Valuable contracts<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

It could, for example, increase their supply of weapons to Damascus, establish a closer relationship with Iran or reduce their cooperation with Washington, says correspondent.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

What is clear is that Russia won’t leave his closest ally in the Middle East nor interests in Syria: including the naval base that holds in Tartus on the Mediterranean, or their substantial commercial contracts with Damascus, mainly for arms sales.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

………<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abAfter losing a contract of $13,000 million with Iran, because of international sanctions, and that canceled it contracts of US$ 4.5 billion with Libya, the Russian defense industry wobbles\u00bb said in a commentary on CNN.com Professor Daniel Treisman of the Department of science policy of the University of California at Los Angeles.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

…..<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00abIn addition to exports of weapons, Russian companies have made huge investments in the Syrian infrastructure and the energy and tourism sectors, which have been valued at $US19.400 million<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tweet………………… \u00bfPor qu\u00e9 China, Rusia e Ir\u00e1n se oponen a la intervenci\u00f3n en Siria? ……. ……. Why are China, Russia and Iran oppose intervention in Syria? ………. …… BBc \u00a0\u00a0Mundo ….. …….. Etnopaisaje.com + dibujos … … . .. . . En las \u00faltimas horas cambi\u00f3 s\u00fabitamente la situaci\u00f3n en un conflicto que ha durado […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-etnopaisaje"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25581"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25586,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25581\/revisions\/25586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.floracantabrica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}